Does God Exist?


Home



Introduction:

    On this page, the classical proofs of God are listed. These proofs are listed by St. Thomas of Aquinas in "Summa Theologica". These are put in my own words, but a more orthodox version can be found here.

    Then my personal proofs are listed. It can be argued that they are not valid or are only variations of the classical proofs. However, in many parts of my engineering work, philosophical solutions provide the shortest and safest route to the answer, if the solutions are correctly applied. The personal proofs are separated, because in my solutions that involve these proofs, the proofs do not always produce the desired results if they are part of the classical proofs.

    This usually happens because my proofs were developed independently, and the context of how the proof applies to science isn't necessarily consistent with how Aquinas applied them.


Prime Mover (Classical):

    Aquinas didn't derive all parts of the "Summa Theologica", rather the book is listing of all known theology of the time.

    The prime mover proof is the first proof listed in history. It is from Aristotle.

    The concept is that anything that is in motion has to have been put into motion by something other than itself.


First Cause (Classical):

    Nothing can be it's own cause. If there is no cause, then there can be no effect. Since effects exist, then the first cause exists. We call the first cause God.


Existence (Classical):

    Nothing can exist, unless its existence is derived from something that already exists. Or, if at any time there was no existence, then at the present time, no existence is possible. We call the initial and continual existence, God.


Different Degrees (Classical):

    If anything is more and something else is less, then there has to be a most or least. We call the most, God.


Order (Classical):

    Contrary to Darwinism, nothing happens by chance. If in billions of chances an outlier occurs that is fortunate, then look at all the the opportunity for Murphy's law to be applied in every other case. There are literally billions of ways that things can and will go wrong. That is for sure. Entropy always attacks symmetry. If some order did exist but wasn't maintained, the order soon fades into randomness. Nothing could be more clear than the fact that all order is from design. The Designer who creates the order is called God.


Consistency (Personal):

    If there was no god or more than one god then the physical laws that we know would not be in all places. For example, the laws of gravity and light are the same on the moon as they are in the next star system or galaxy. In fact all laws on earth are good for the universe.

    Without a god, the laws would be random and everything would be random. If there was more than one God, they would implement different laws in their own domain.

    This is an extension of the "order" proof given above. Many scientists call themselves experts at these universal laws, but they never stop to think how these laws can be universal.

    As John 1 says, "The Light shined forth in the darkness." Yet, the light doesn't remove the darkness; some of the disorder remains. For this reason, every leaf, snowflake, and so forth are unique. Actually, they are not unique; they are random. This is the disorder, that the Light did not remove.


Butterfly Effect (Personal):

    The "butterfly effect" is actually a story where someone goes back in time. They step off the path and kill a butterfly. When they get back to the future, things are different, because the effect of killing the butterfly rippled through history.

    The idea is valid, because everything affects everything else. But, if everything affects everything else, there can be only one Effect. If there were more than one Effect, universal affection (or relativity in Einstein's language) would not be possible. Affection is only possible in a relationship, and a relationship is only possible when there is a common element.

    For example, if a computer somehow created a new intelligence, humans would never recognize or differentiate it from other garbage that a computer creates when it is not working correctly.

    Everything is related to the same Effect. And that makes the butterfly effect possible.

    Since everything affects everything else, there is only one effect.


Human Spirit (Personal):

    How is it that humans became a super species, that dominates everything else on earth? That is not natural. We have no super snake or bird. No, man stands alone as the species that determines the fate of the world. That has to be by design which means that there is a Designer.


Dependent Dimension (Personal):

    All of our food comes from light. But we don't even know what light is, or better, we don't know what light is not. For example, it is both a particle and a wave. Without light, we would have no photosynthesis and therefore, no food or oxygen. We have an entire world that is strong and healthy, but it is completely clueless as to how we even survive for a day. It is hard to argue, that something is not taking care of us from another dimension. We live in a dependent dimension.

    It is not just light providing us with food and oxygen, either. We go on and on about how intelligent we are, but we have no idea what intelligence is or how it happens. Yet as with light, we definitely need it.

    To be sure, there is a marketing term, artificial intelligence (AI), but the definition of what that is constantly changes. In the 1960s, it meant to think like a human which led to object orientated programming (OOP). Yet today, OOP is not considered AI, and it definitely does not think like a human. Expert systems, deep learning, and other AI technologies are all following the same path as OOP. With the exception of systematic philosophy, we don't know how we think, and in systematic philosophy, we think because we have a human spirit which was the previous proof of God's existence.

    We are aware of our environment. If human intelligence was found somewhere in our dimension, we would have found it. We haven't.

    Alas, it is not just intelligence, food, and oxygen; the list goes on and on. For example, we don't even know who we are, if we don't relate to the dimension that is supporting us. We get our identity and purpose from that dimension as well.

    We should face the obvious facts. We are living in a dimension that is dependent upon another dimension. We call the other dimension, God.


Divine Satisfaction (Personal):

    While men chase every satisfaction under the sun as sex, esteem, money, alcohol, and so forth, only God will satiate appetites of men.

    On the negative side, no sin has lasting satisfaction. A priest was teaching a high school class. He gave all the students a chocolate covered eclair with the instruction that no one was to take a bite until given permission. When they chomped down on the eclairs, the students found that they were filled with dirt. The priest said, "That is the way sin is. At first, it tastes good. Then there is the dirt."

    For example, most people are faithful in heterosexual marriages, but no gay "marriages" were found where the couple was faithful more than 5 years (see "What Catholics Think About Sex" on this website.)

    Every appetite will lead to addiction, if it is leaned on for happiness. As Jesus says, "everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin." (John 8:34) Do we say that the drunks on skid row are the happiest people on Earth?

    In addition, while other things will appease one appetite but leave another unsatisfied, God satisfies all appetites. St. Augustine said, "My heart was restless, until it rested in God." However, he could have substituted any body part for "heart". As St. Thomas of Aquinas demonstrates, every part of the body has appetites for God, and so only God can unite the body to a single purpose. Or as Jesus says, "But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you" (Matthew 6:33). Only God satisfies every appetite.

    No old person is happy, except for their relationship with God. We are meant to love God. If we don't, we will never be content. This makes the question, "Does God Exist?", very personal. If God exists, then you can be happy and content in every appetite. You can not be happy without God.


Law of Life (Personal):

    Life reinforces the law. Every good thing makes us live longer. The opposite it true as well; sin kills.

    The concept of good was covered in "What Catholics Think About Sex". As a review, good things make us live longer, and sins shorten are life. Since sin is complex, statistics have to be used to determine between the good and bad. With good data, the answer is infallible.

    In addition, the worse the sin, the faster the death, and vice-versa, those who are the most good, live the longest (I'll repeat; sin is complex, so statistics have to be used). You can follow the link, if you want to see how this works. Yet, since this is the way life is, it shows that God is in control.

    Jesus says, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). Only life gives life. And only life can maintain life. For example, you can not stay alive unless you eat something that is alive. Man can not create life; only life creates life. We don't know what life is, except that we experience life. Life is like intelligence; we have it, but we don't know what life is. Yet, Jesus says that he is the life. These are clear signs that life comes from another dimension.

    So, while we don't know what life is, we know that life is increased by following the law which builds an unbreakable bond between life and law. It gets more interesting than that. Our ability to follow the law depends on how much we love. As Jesus says, "If you love Me, you will keep My commandments" (John 14:15). Many read this as, if you keep My commandments, then you demonstrate your love for me, but that is backwards. Our ability to keep the law depends on how much we love. Obedience follows love (not vice-versa - see next paragraph). That creates a tight circle between love, law, and life which is verified by statistical facts that no one can deny.

    Jesus says, "If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love" (John 15:10). This is often interpreted as, "I will love you if you keep, my commandments." But, Jesus always loves the sinner. The correct reading is, if you follow the law you will live because of your relationship with God that enabled you to follow the law. In other words, our relationship with God is why we are alive. The intensity of the relationship determines the obedience to the law which statistical correlates to how long we live.

    The statistical proof of John 14:6 (see above) proves that God exists.


System of God (Personal):

    This isn't so much a proof that God exists, as it is an answer to the most commonly held reasons that atheists and agnostics cite that there is no God or He is not personally involved.

    The most popular reason that God does not exist, is that God is made into the image of the person. For example, a person might have been abused when they were young, and they ask, "If God is all loving and all powerful, why didn't He prevent it?" This question can also be rephrased as, "If God is so great and kind, why don't I get everything I want?" which is slightly more hedonistic.

    Of course, the answer is that God is not a hedonist. Not only that, Jesus had it made being the God of Heaven and all, but He gave all that up to come down to Earth to die for our sins on a cross. Then He feeds His Church with His own body. Does that sound like a hedonist?

    Let's start with the cross which is usually depicted in a confusing way. Only an engineer could marvel at the efficiency of that torture. In the first place, the whole cross wasn't carried. It would be too heavy. How would it be set upright without a lot of work? That's not how it was done.

    The hands of the Christ were tied to the cross beam. When He carried the cross, He could not catch Himself when He fell. That is why the falling down was such a big deal. He would fall flat on His face and the beam would intensify the damage.

    The post of the cross was already planted and reused. When the execution party reached the post, they simply hung the beam on a couple of hooks and tied the feet. After several days of agony, the victim would die. In extreme and rare cases, when they really had it in for the victim, they would nail the hands or feet to increase the pain. In some cases, they nailed both the hands and the feet. The nails didn't hold the victim on the cross; that would be unreliable. Rope or chains, that were probably tied at the elbows and ankles, held the victim to the cross.

    In other extreme cases, they would scourge the victim before they put him on the cross. This increased the pain because his raw back would rub on the wood as the victim tried to keep from suffocating (the dance of the crucifix).

    Jesus, the God of Heaven, received both the scourging and nails which is almost unique. In addition, Jesus was crowned with thorns. In other words, God didn't make it easy for Himself.

    The night before He did all of that, He had the last supper. We were instructed to eat His body and drink His blood. He fully intended to give His life to us for all time in a bath of pain that held nothing back.

    This tells us something about God and, thus, the system of God. After the death and resurrection of the Christ, the Holy Spirit empowers the Body of Christ that was prepared by Jesus with His own body. From Spider-man, "With great power comes great responsibility." Jesus tells us to take up our cross and follow Him (Luke 9:23).

    Nowhere does it say that if you follow Jesus, you will have an easy life. Jesus says the exact opposite.

    But, the atheists rephrase the question, "If God is all powerful, why doesn't He just Will it without all the suffering". The answer is that, "The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love" (1 John 4:8). If God theoretically loved us (nothing physical), then it is not love. And vice-versa, we can not simply say that we love God, we have to live it. Love is holistic. God is a Trinity, and all three parts of God needs to love us. In the same way, we have to love God with our Body, mind (spirit), and appetites (soul). As Jesus says, "the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak" (Matt 26:41).

    Just as a toddler can never walk without developing muscles and coordination, so too, we will never be holy without prayer (relationship) and penance (pain).

    Theoretical love is never given. How can that be real? No, love has to be expressed and tested or it is not love. A love that is never tested can not be authentic. It is not enough for us to sometimes think that we love God when we get what we want.

    From God's frame of reference, we were created yesterday and know nothing. We have some growing to do and decisions to make. If we don't express our love by sacrificing our life, we our not worthy of a God who already did that for us.

    In a living body, the cells must give up their own independence to become a part of the body; if not, the body will reject them. "For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake, he is the one who will save it" (Luke 9:24).

    The atheist question ultimately becomes, "If God is all powerful and all loving, why do we live in a messed up world that is rife with pain." The traditional answer is that humans have free will, and they can choose evil. But that is incomplete. Let's take God's point of view. It would be highly selfish of God to have everyone love God by design. What is the point of that? It is similar to a naughty teenager creating beautiful people for sinful purposes. Is that the God you want? Do you want God to create you to satisfy His own selfishness?

    The fall of man (Adam eating the apple) was not necessary, but the sin of men testifies to the authenticity of God, because God did not rig the game to get His way which would be selfish. No, God allowed Himself to be rejected. When not appreciated or even recognized, He redeemed men in a bath of pain. Is it not edifying for men to see the example set by God?

    When teaching, it is sometimes better to let the student make a mistake. By correcting the mistake for the student, you teach through the eyes and mindset of the student. So too, God teaches us through our own mistake.

    Besides it being selfish of God, if God rigged the system so that we could not make a mistake, our love could never develop. How could it? For we would not be independent and responsible. It is only our narrow mindset that causes us to want everything to go our way and demand God do the same. That is not love. God operates on a much greater scale, and we need to crawl out of our own infancy by becoming independent and responsible. In other words, we need to love God back. That relationship makes us move beyond human narcissism, where we start to see God as something more than a sugar daddy in the sky. As we do that, we begin to appreciate love more than pleasure. To state this in the atheist question, just because we feel something less than great, doesn't mean that God is not all loving, because feeling good is not the same thing as love.

    As previously shown and as Jesus declared, life, love, and God are all the same. God is infinitely simple. There is only one design. God is love (not selfish hedonism). The Body of Christ can not tolerate hedonism. For then it would no longer be a living body of love.

    No one can serve two masters (Matt 6:24). We either love our own body, or we love the Body of Christ. Our love will be tested, and our hope is that our love for Christ is real.

    Appetites have an orientation. It is going to hurt to change them. Yet, we have the power to undergo the necessary change, because we are loved. When we choose love, we choose everlasting life.

    The power of love will seem like nothing more than a bland euphemism before we have developed a relationship with God. Yet, as we grow in our relationship with God, we will find that every appetite will kneel before the power of Love. It is only then, that we begin to see that God is a omnipotent force who is perfect and requires us to be like Him so that we will live in Him.

    The god that the hedonist invents, does not bestow on us the dignity of Love. We can't live is our own selfishness and at the same time live for the love of God and others.

    The Christian God is one who has expressed His love for us. With the exception of Judaism, which is a forerunner for Christianity, no other religion redeems through relationship. In this life, we are given the chance to express our love for God. That design is not an accident. God gave the angels the same test, and that test was authentic because some failed. God is real, and He demands a real relationship.

    The expression of love is a feature (not a weakness). The system of God has pain and suffering, because we are called to be a true witness of love which is necessary in the perfect system. Or without pain and suffering, love is artificial and synthetic. Real love is expressed and tested. Even the Garden of Eden had a test. God doesn't need anything. But God is love. So God expresses His love for us and His love for us is as real as the crucifixion. There is no greater love than to lay down one's life for their friends (John 15:13). In the same way, "If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross daily and follow Me" (Luke 9:23). Even in our imagination, we could not invent a more loving system.




Home


© 2015 - 2020 Restoration People, All rights reserved