The Ideal:
Jesus said, "I have told you this
so that my joy may be in you and
that your joy may be complete."
(John 15:11), and then Jesus tells
us that we would be better off not
having sex. (Matt 19:12). How does
that work?
Unlike much of the world, Jesus
doesn't see sex as the climax of
human existence, and His Church is
a reflection of that attitude. Life
obviously has far more to offer,
and Jesus said that sex isn't even
a part of death (Mark 12:25). Sex
won't make us happy, but if we
allow it, sex will prevent us from
finding happiness.
We will most likely have dark and
unreasonable thoughts when our
appetites don't align with God's
rules and expectations. The Church
bends over backwards to accommodate
us in every way possible, but of
course, the perfection of Jesus can
not improve. In other words, the
ideal remains firm. We might think
that Jesus has crazy ideas about
sex and marriage, but our attitude
is driven by our appetites. If we
come to our senses, we would
realize that we are not smarter
than God.
|
The Good and the Bad:
Those, who take a position on
sex that is against Church teaching,
usually try to convince themselves
that the Church is wrong. For
example, they might think that
everything comes from the Bible and
that the Church doesn't have an
accurate translation or
interpretation of the Bible. In
reality, the Church knows that she is
correct in a number of different
ways. One of those ways is the
concept of good.
What is the concept of good? When God
was making the world, at the end of
each day He would say that his
creation was good (e.g., Genesis
1:31). God wasn't bragging. When He
said that they were good, He was
saying that they were perfect. They
would flourish.
All good things are simple and
thrive (among other attributes), and
all bad things are complex and die
(among other issues). When Adam and
Eve sinned, they threw a complexity
into the system and death came into the
world.
In the complexity of our era, we can
not look at the biography of any
person and make a determination
unless the person was perfectly
simple. A perfectly simple person
lives forever, because they are good.
We can, however, use statistics (if
we have them) to discover all sin
(remember, sin kills things), because
statistics uncover the correlation
which mathematically must exist
unless the world was perfectly
complex or random (in which case it
would be dead).
In other words, statistics can be
used to discover Catholic morality.
No, mathematicians did not write
Catholic morality, but the identical
deductions of mathematics and
theology should make a believer out
of any person who respects reality.
To put this in a longer and simpler
form, we can mathematically test
whether the Catholic theologians got
it right. Let's put them to the test!
The Catholics believe that you should
go to church every week (ideally more
often than that). We need to be fed
by the Word and Body of Christ so
that we become the Body or Christ.
All parts of the body needs to work
together as much as possible. By
praying together, our hearts are
moved to care for each other. Jesus
did not teach his disciples to
practice their Faith as some type
private meditation system; He started
a Church. We should use it.Those who go to
church live longer [
see report].
All public high schools
teach that the homosexual lifestyle
is healthy. In this case, we can pit
Catholic theologians against the
elite of modernism. The mathematics
show that homosexual sex is more
unhealthy than cigarettes [
see report].
Some people, who are ignorant of
mathematics and homosexuality, will
argue that gays die sooner because of
AIDs, but AIDs is only one of many
problems that these poor souls have,
and correlation doesn't accept
excuses. For example, in the 1970s
the homosexuals lobbied Congress for
a law that forbade health insurance
companies from discriminating against
them. The homosexuals, themselves,
argued that a homosexual had about 25
times more health care costs than a
moral person.
Let's look at one more issue. Is it a
sin (bad) to use birth control?
The Church knows that recreational
sex is bad. All parts of our body
demand respect. No part of the body
can be used for the entertainment of
other parts of the body. That lack of
respect degrades all parts of the
body, and creates friction in
relationships. For example, it has
caused of thousands of divorces as
the following chart [
see source] shows, because
every recreational sex act deepens the
selfish appetites. Marriage is a call
to service which is irreconcilable with
selfishness.
|
|
No person wants to be a sex object,
and no part of a person wants to be
used that way, either.
Jesus does not want us to fast from
sex as a discipline; He wants all
parts of our body to have a
relationship with God (James 4:1-8).
No one or part can serve two masters.
Some of the manufacturers of birth
control pills did a study (would that
be biased?) that reached the
conclusion that women who used birth
control lived 4.5 hours (that's hours
not years) longer. This "study" was
repeated at least 100 times in the
press. Let's skip their funny math,
and look at the cold hard numbers.
The study included old women who had
not used birth control for 30 years.
In these cases, the prior use of
birth control may have helped, but
the numbers are not clear (e.g., they
lost about 1/3rd of their data). The
study showed clearly that young women
who used birth control were 3 times
more likely to die while they were on
the pill. We can, therefore, conclude
that the active use of birth control
by women of child bearing age is a
sin, but the offense is overlooked if
the transgression occurred years ago.
These numbers enforce Catholic
teaching, and Catholics are becoming
one of the few moral voices in this
area.[
see report]
We could carry the concept of good
and bad on to infinity, but as a
matter of practicality, we have made
our point. Neither Jesus nor His
Church is guessing. The mathematics
backs them up every time. The concept
of good and bad is clear, scientific,
simple, and always accurate.
|
The BBC reports:
From (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/401091.stm)
The research looked at 4,000 old
people from North Carolina, and
found that of the 1,177 who died
during a six-year period, 22.9%
were frequent church attenders,
compared with 37.4 who were
infrequent attenders.
Similar results were produced by
the University of California at
Berkeley in a study of some 5,000
people aged 21 to 65.
Those who attended religious
services at least once a week had
a 23% lower risk of dying over the
28 years on which the research was
based.
|
|
About.com reports:
From (http://longevity.about.com)
http://longevity.about.com/od/longevityboosters/a/religion_life.htm
A study using data from the
Women's Health Initiative found
that women aged 50 and up were 20%
less likely to die in any given
year if they attended religious
services weekly (15% reduction if
they attended less than weekly)
compared to those that never
attend religious services. This
analysis was controlled for age,
ethnicity, income level and (most
importantly) current health
status. The data was collected
through surveys and an annual
review of medical records. What
was interesting was that the
religion effect applied to overall
risk of death, but not to risk of
death from heart conditions. There
is no explanation for why that
might be. The fact that the study
controlled for overall health
status makes it more possible that
attending religious services has a
positive impact on health (not
just that healthier people go to
services more often).
Another study also found benefit
to attending religion services,
this time expressed in added years
of life. Researchers have found
that weekly attendance at
religious services is associated
with 2 to 3 additional years of
life. These findings were
controlled for other factors such
as amount of physical exercise and
taking cholesterol medications.
|
LifeSiteNews.com - A new study
which analyzed tens of thousands
of gay obituaries and compared
them with AIDS deaths data from
the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC), has shown that the life
expectancy for homosexuals is
about twenty years shorter than
that of the general public. The
study, entitled "Gay obituaries
closely track officially reported
deaths from AIDS", has been
published in Psychological Reports
(2005;96:693-697).
|
A study conducted in Vancouver
British Columbia and published in
1997 in the International Journal
of Epidemiology (Vol. 26, 657-61:
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/657)
indicated that "life expectancy at
age 20 years for gay and bisexual
men is 8 to 20 years less than for
all men."
|
|
Sexual Satisfaction:
The good and bad is one way that we
can use to tell whether something is
immoral, but we have many other
weapons in our discernment arsenal.
Another method is satisfaction. All
things from God satisfy and draw us
into deeper satisfaction. Sin fails to
satisfy and leaves us craving for
more. For example, and alcoholic needs
more alcohol each time to get the same
effect. All sin is the same way. Each
episode requires more than the last,
and the dissatisfaction grows more
intense.
In a true story, a priest was teaching
this lesson to a high school class. He
gave them all chocolate eclairs, but
they could not take a bite until he
gave the word. At his command, the
whole class bit in at once to discover
that the eclairs were actually
chocolate covered dirt! He then said,
that is the way sin is. It might
initially seem good, but then it gets
dirty.
A happily married couple is content
with what they have, and they look
forward to their vocation as parents.
It is a very satisfying and stable
life. Most married couples remain
faithful. [
See Study]
Those who choose to practice sexual
recreation (rather than procreation)
are having selfish sex which is never
satisfying. At first, it might seem
like chocolate, but before long it
tastes like dirt. [
See Study]
Vice provides no satisfaction. When
the satisfaction is lacking, most
people try more vice. As their sin
increases, their ability to turn away
from the sin becomes more difficult.
Whole communities (even nations) can
be dragged into a downward spiral of sin.
Everyone hopes for satisfaction, but
sin does not provide satisfaction.
Look at how far things got out of hand
in Sodom (Genesis 19:5) or in Gibeah
(Judges 19:22). Any country that
allows perverse sexual recreation will
meet the same fate with the passage of
time.
Since sexual perversion fails to
satisfy, everything gets worse and
worse. We see this today. At first, it
was sex outside of marriage. That led
to unmarried couples. Then came same
sex couples. We can bet the molesting
of children is not far away. The
downward spiral never stops. Sin
doesn't have a bottom. At some point,
rape will not be considered assault
(like Sodom, Gibeah, and other
places).
Societies like these are devoid of
happiness, and our government is
insisting on sexual perversion such as
same sex marriage.
|
Source
A nationally representative
survey of 884 men and 1,288
women published in the Journal
of Sex Research found that 77
percent of married men and 88
percent of married women had
remained faithful to their
marriage vows.[1]
A study of homosexual men in the
Netherlands published in the
journal AIDS found that the
"duration of steady
partnerships" was 1.5 years.[2]
In his study of male
homosexuality in Western
Sexuality: Practice and Precept
in Past and Present Times,
Pollak found that "few
homosexual relationships last
longer than two years, with many
men reporting hundreds of
lifetime partners."[3]
In Male and Female
Homosexuality, Saghir and Robins
found that the average male
homosexual live-in relationship
lasts between two and three
years.[4]
In The Male Couple, authors
David P. McWhirter and Andrew M.
Mattison reported that, in a
study of 156 males in homosexual
relationships lasting from one
to thirty-seven years:
|
|
"Only seven couples have a
totally exclusive sexual
relationship, and these men all
have been together for less than
five years. Stated another way,
all couples with a relationship
lasting more than five years
have incorporated some provision
for outside sexual activity in
their relationships."[5]
|
1. |
Michael W. Wiederman, "Extramarital Sex:
Prevalence and Correlates
in a National Survey," Journal
of Sex Research 34 (1997): 170.
|
2. |
Maria Xiridou, et al, "The Contribution of
Steady and Casual Partnerships to the Incidence of
HIV Infection among Homosexual Men in Amsterdam,"
AIDS 17 (2003): 1031.
|
3. |
M. Pollak, "Male Homosexuality," in Western
Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and
Present Times, ed. P. Aries and A. Bejin,
translated by Anthony Forster (New York, NY: B.
Blackwell, 1985): 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi
in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality
(Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991):
124, 125.
|
4. |
M. Saghir and E. Robins, Male and Female
Homosexuality (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins,
1973): 225; L. A. Peplau and H. Amaro,
"Understanding Lesbian Relationships," in
Homosexuality:Social, Psychological, and
Biological Issues, ed. J. Weinrich and W. Paul
(Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982).
|
5. |
David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison, The
Male Couple: How Relationships Develop (Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984): 252, 253.
|
|
Of Human Diginity:
About 35 years ago, when people acted
in sexually perverted ways, they would
claim that the Devil made them do it.
After that became the punch line of
many jokes, they now claim that they
were born a sexual pervert. The old
Devil excuse is much better than the
genetic excuse, but they both deny the
free will of the sinner. All humans
have free will, and anyone who does
not have a free will is subhuman.
Most judges, legislators, governors,
and President Obama claim that
homosexuals are subhuman (the genetic
excuse), but we again find that their
contemporary logic wilts before the
intellectual flame of the Catholic
Church who claims that all homosexuals
are fully human.
Humans have human dignity, because
they are trinary beings (made in the
likeness of the Holy Trinity). Most of
us are a little rusty on this subject,
so let us take a few paragraphs to
review it.
Inanimate Objects:
When the object has only one part,
that part has no chance to relate
to another part within its being.
Without any relationship, no life
is possible. Dead plants or
animals and inorganic substances
fall into this area. Life only
exists within a relationship.
Living Organisms:
With two parts, a relationship
exists between the two parts, and
therefore, life exists in the
being. Since life exists as a
single relationship, the being has
no interest in anything except
that which immediately pertains to
life (e.g., survival, food,
reproduction). To use an example
from Aquinas, dogs can smell much
better than humans, but you don't
see dogs stopping to smell the
roses; because the sweet smell of
a rose is not pertinent to the
survival of a dog. On the other
hand, humans will climb Mount
Everest for some reason that they
can't quite put their finger on.
We wouldn't find a dog climbing
Mount Everest, unless the dog
could smell food on the summit.
For if life is but a single
relationship, then life only has
one dimension. Living organisms
are formed when a soul assumes a
physical form such as a body.
Plants and animals have two parts.
They are binary beings.
Spiritual Beings:
All spiritual beings have 3 parts
which have 3 relationships between
them. The Bible says that man is
made in the image of God (Genesis
1:27). Since God is a Trinity, we
would assume that man is a trinity,
and indeed, we do have three parts.
Spiritual souls are formed when a
spirit assumes a soul, and humans are
formed when a spiritual soul
assumes a human body. The three
relationships of a spiritual being
construct a number abilities and
characteritics that are not found
in binary beings. One of those
characteristics is free will.
Free Will: Three
relationships create a three
dimensional life which has many
interests. For example, spiritual
beings (e.g., humans) might fast
from food and sex in search of
understanding, or their survival
might be sacrificed for a cause.
On the other hand, binary
beings perceive a single
relationship and are unable to
choose anything that is outside
that relationship. Choice requires
at least two things to choose
from, but binary beings have
only one relationship to choose
from; so binary beings do not
have free will.
If homosexuals do not have free will,
they are subhuman. The Catholics teach
that homosexuals are humans and,
therefore, have free will. Our
homosexual leaders, in their
preposterous ignorance of biology,
have declared themselves to be
subhumans who were somehow born from
humans. They intend to make our world
the "Planet of the Apes", yet apes
know that sex is for procreation
(rather than recreation). In this way,
the behavior of our homosexual leaders
is significantly below that of apes.
If you are struggling with immoral
sexual inclinations, the chapter on
self control will show you how to
bring your appetites into the
realization of God's plan.
|
The Concept of Marriage:
In the current confusion of marriage,
many have denigrated marriage as
something that only relates to a
sexual act. In their arrogant
ignorance, they then assume that any
sexual act will function as the
sacrament of marriage. But this is the
blind leading the blind. For the sake
of sanity, let's take a look at some
of the fundamentals that relate to
marriage.
While some men may assume that they
invented sex, the whole concept of sex
came from God. If we remember, it was
not good for man to be alone (Genesis
2:18), so God created woman from man.
Many assume that Adam was lonely
without Eve, but Adam had a beatific
vision of God; so Adam was in utopia,
but still, it was not good (did not
get
stronger, bigger, and better
).
Adam needed Eve to multiply, but
having babies is only one part of a
larger concept. At a more fundamental
level, no system will propagate (much
less flourish - i.e., be good) without
a cycle which means that a propagating
system always has phases.
For example, by themselves the
electric and magnetic fields go a few
inches, but when they are combined
into a complementing electromagnetic
cycle they propagate to the ends
of the universe.
Both external and internal combustion
engines operate from the Carnot cycle.
The hot must be hotter than the cold
before the engine can function.
In both electromagnetic and combustion
engines, the strength of engine is
determined by how much difference
exists between the phases. If one
phases is stronger than the other, the
strength of the system is determined
by the weaker phase.
Human beings (and many other things)
propagate with masculine and feminine
phases, but propagation is much more
than mere multiplication which we can
show in a number of ways.
1. |
Formation:
The spirit contains the
identity, and our identity
(including sexual gender) is all
through us including our DNA. The
spirit assumes the soul to form a
spiritual soul, and then the
spiritual soul assumes a human
body. The spiritual soul assumes
the human body to match the
identity of the spirit. In other
words, our identity chooses us; we
don't choose our identity. If life
is something more than
multiplication, then our sexual
identity is for something more than
reproduction. In other words, we
have our sexual identity our whole
life. It plays a part in everything
that we do (not just sex).
Many people deny their identity.
They argue that girls and boys are
trained to act a certain way. Yet,
it has never been shown where
alternate training reverses the sex
of the DNA. Our spirit is
unchanging throughout our lives. We
are recognized by our spirit (not
by our training). For example, a
man is recognized by his
masculinity; we would not be able
to recognize whether he was forced
to play with dolls when he was a
boy. Regardless of what we do, we
have the same sex all of our lives.
Our spirit chose the sex, and our
spirit does not change.
If sexual gender is primarily for
reproduction, then why is it
integrated into our personality for
the duration of our lives?
|
2. |
Family:
The family is forever which
is much longer than any sex act. In
other words, if masculine and
feminine is reduced to
multiplication, then it is far more
efficient to ship the production
out for value added behavioral
skills. To put this yet another
way, if this was the "Brave New
World" where children were massed
produced, why wouldn't all children
be trained in some training center?
In the family, children are trained
by both masculine and feminine
authorities (namely Mom and Dad).
If neither Mom nor Dad had a sexual
identity, than why not have one,
three, four, or changing authority
figures? In the traditional family,
even after the kids have left the
nest, Mom and Dad stay together
until death. How does that
multiply? Rather than trying to
improve the family by looking at
alternatives, we should try to
improve our family by trying to
understand what a family is. God
doesn't allow us to rotate mates or
parents in a family because the
strength of the family is in its
relationships. We have to bloom
where we are planted.
Jesus elected to grow up in a
family. If there was a more perfect
way, He would have been obligated
to show it to us. In any Hollywood
movie script, Jesus, who reigns
across all dimensions, would have
simply appeared out of nowhere, yet
Jesus grew up in a family. He, who
is all intelligent, chose to have
a family to prepare Him for His
ministry. What family dynamic did
Jesus see that we don't? We see
multiplication; so we obviously are
not seeing some other fundamental.
In an intact family, each child has
key masculine and feminine
relationships that nurture the
spirit of the child. When the child
learns to respect both masculine
and feminine intelligences, the
child is able to parlay that
respect into the innovative and
participatory nature of the greater
society which is probably the
strongest reason why children from
intact traditional families
are
more successful.
The family is much more than
multiplication of members. It is a
training ground that cycles between
masculine and feminine. This type
of training nurses the emotional
and mental attributes of the
children to become strong members
of a greater society.
|
3. |
Faith:
The Church does not
replicate through sexual acts, but
it sports both masculine and
feminine family figures on multiple
levels. In addition, the devotions
are split between masculine and
feminine. For example, of the six
Holy Days of obligation, January
1st (Mary Mother of God), August
15th (Assumption), and December 8th
(Immaculate Conception) center on
Marian themes. Or in the Mysteries
of the Rosary, multiple Marian
meditations exist in both the
Joyful and Glorious Mysteries.
In more modern times, the Church
has promulgated both the Sacred
Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate
Heart of Mary. If sex was meant
only for multiplication, what are
we to think of all of this?
|
It should be obvious, that we could
find many different ways to show that
sex is not only for multiplication,
but the ones we have listed should be
sufficient.
Eve forces Adam into an entirely
new relationship dynamic. Eve has
her own spirit, and that spirit
creates a desire in Adam to be by
Eve's side. The relationship was
probably not sexual at the very
beginning, yet Eve attracted Adam's
attention. Adam's thinking involved
Eve, so Eve became a part of Adam's
(the human) process or rational
thought. Before Eve, Adam's thought
was psychological; Eve added an
sociological element. But we
understand nothing, if we don't
understand why Eve made Adam good.
God couldn't make Adam good by
creating another Adam. As we have
already shown, the good is
definitely more than multiplication.
To state the obvious, Adam was
masculine, and Eve was feminine. The
good was created by complementing
the masculine with the feminine. As
we have already shown in
electromagnetic and carnot cycles,
we need to have an interaction of
two forces to have propagation (much
less good). Before we can see the
interaction of masculine and
feminine, we need to define
masculine and feminine.
Masculinity is defined by men, and
femininity is defined by women. Men and
women didn't invent masculinity and
feminity respectively, but we see the
intelligence through them.
The best definition of masculine and
feminine would be from the perfect
man, Jesus, and woman, Mary. All
other definitions certainly help,
but they are somewhat more complex
because of sin.
For His part Jesus defined
Christianity. He spent His time
teaching His principles and
establishing His Church. When a
person defines something as a part
of their personality that is the
very meaning of individuation. By
defining Christianity, Jesus
individuated His Church.
With the wisdom of the Holy Spirit,
the Church spends a lot of effort
reflecting on the perfect woman.
Though the power of the Holy Spirit,
the perfect woman, Mary, gives birth
to the perfect man, Jesus. Mary
urges (orders?) Jesus to perform His
first miracle. Even when Jesus
remonstrates, Mary orders the
servants to follow Jesus orders, and
Jesus obliges. It was as if the
whole miracle ministry was Mary's
idea and will. In the same way, Mary
urges (orders?) us to follow her
example from saying "Yes" to God's
plan to standing at the foot of the
cross. Mary was in the upper room
for Pentecost which is the birthday
of the Church. That is the second
time we see Mary team up with the
Holy Spirit to give birth. In the
Bible (Acts 2:43-47), we read about
a near perfect Christian community
that was exploding in numbers. After
Mary went to Heaven, we haven't seen
anything like it.
When Jesus Ascended into Heaven, He
left clear orders to a group of
disciples; when Mary was Assumed up
to Heaven, she left a nearly ideal
and unique Christian community that
was rapidly expanding into every
part of the Jerusalem society. It's
all pretty clear, if we want to see
it. Jesus individuated (defined)
Christianity as a concept, and Mary
integrated (implanted)
Christianity into the community.
The masculine role of Jesus and
feminine role of Mary can not be
overstated, because they were
perfect. As sunlight shines through
a perfect glass, every color is
present that is in the sunlight.
Although (because?, i.e., perfect
appetites) they were virgins, we
look to Jesus and Mary for the very
definition of masculinity and
femininity respectively. Jesus is
the way for all of us, and Mary is
our Mother with no exceptions.
Just as it was not good for Adam to
be alone, we know that the Chuch
would not have flourished with only
Jesus. The Church needs Mary. In
traditional Catholic language,
Jesus is the groom, the Church is
the bride, and Mary is the Mother
of the bride and groom.
If Christianity is going to thrive,
it needs to cycle between masculine
and feminine, because all human
intelligence must follow this
cycle. As we have
shown, human
intelligence is received from
another dimension, and that
intelligence is realized within a
person. Yet, the implementation of
that intelligence into society
require both the definition
(individuation) and implementation
(integration).
The same cycle must play out inside
a person. Only one part of the
person receives the intelligence,
then it needs to be defined and
implemented to spread very far.
From our molecular characteristics
(it takes multiple cycles for three
trillion cells to "get it"), we can
see that the cycle has to continue
the masculine (defintion) and
feminine (implementation) for some
number of cycles before we become
conscious of it.
Through dream analysis, Carl Jung
demonstrated that in every man,
there is a woman (and vice-versa).
As we have just shown in the
preceding paragraph, these are
vital parts of our intelligence.
Every woman can use her masculine
side to invent (define), and every
man can use his feminine side to
nurture (implement). Yet over the
course of years (if not minutes),
the man/woman is more interested in
being masculine/feminine because
that is the identity cast in
his/her spirit, and the spirit
never changes.
Since the masculine-feminine
propagation cycle as it applies to
human intelligence is rather new,
let us examine it more closely in
several mediums.
1. |
Software:
A computer is only a heater
without software. Several notable
programs were wrote, but every
program had to be started from
scratch. A woman, Grace Hopper,
said that the men were only
interested in their programs, but
she took the time to find out what
each of their programs would do.
She wrote a program that combined
other programs, a linker (she
called it a compiler), so that
people could benefit from existing
software. That concept integrated
computers into business. Her
linker gradually became a compiler
and a language, COBOL.
She also distributed the source
code of her software and asked the
users to send her their
improvements which was the first
use of open source software, that
software model is a large part of
the Internet today. Her exact role
in this concept is not clear,
however.
In her history, we see the
masculine and feminine implemented
twice. The men wrote the various
software programs, and her
software (she was the only woman)
integrated other software
together. In the second case, as
the market grows (becomes
defined), the growing number of
users want too many features or
adjustments that the development
team can't deliver which forks
(splinters) the software when the
disenfrancised see the need to
take a different path. By allowing
users to make their own changes,
the language is integrated into
many places it wouldn't have been
able to go. This allows the
product to maintain its integrity
to the point that it becomes the
de facto standard.
|
2. |
Marketing:
Before any product is successful
in the market, it will go through
at least one masculine
(definition) and feminine
(integration) cycle, and it
usually goes through several
cycles.
Let's look at television (TV), as
an example. As it was being
invented, a number of mechanical
TV designs were attempted, but
Philo Farnsworth had a dream of an
all electronic TV which he
demonstrated before anyone else in
1928.
In 1929, Farsnworth's investors
wanted to know when they would see
the money, but there were no TV
stations, studios, companies, or
stars. In other words, TV was
invented, but it was not
integrated into society; so there
was no money.
As more people became involved in
TV (the integration), they
demanded more from TV. In other
words, the masculine proposes to
the feminine. If the feminine
(market) accepts, then the
feminine demands more definition
(masculine). This cycle will
continue as long as the product is
relevant.
The designer (masculine) has to
think a lot about the market
(feminine) to find something that
will integrate (feminine accepts),
and the feminine has to be
enamored by the definition
(masculine) to drive the product
towards the next definition.
It is entirely possible that a
great invention is rejected by the
market. Several flying machines
from India, Egypt, and Europe have
been recorded, but of course that
knowledge was never accepted or
the masculine-feminine cycle was
broken. As a society, we don't
know anything that is outside the
masculine-feminine cycle. And,
inside our minds, no thought will
reach consciousness without using
the masculine-feminine cycle.
Everything we know is driven by
this primary cyle.
|
3. |
Government:
Any goverment that thrives has a
masculine-feminine balance. In the
American system, we have the
structure (masculine) of the
executive branch and individual
rights (feminine) of the
judiciary.
While this might seem so simple
that Americans take it for
granted, it is actually so hard to
achieve that it has only been
implemented several times in
history. When it was realized, the
ruler usually became so powerful
that the masculine suppressed the
feminine which caused the system
to collapse. In America, the
president has been growing
stronger, and the rights of the
citizens are chronically eroded.
The same balance needs to be
carried out at state, local,
family, and even individual
levels. For example, in many
impoverished countries, the family
is so overbearing that the family
members are unable to follow their
inspiration. As family members are
not able to thrive, the community
infrastructure, such as roads,
phones, and schools, of the local
community is never developed. The
communities are the building
blocks of the state. So, poor
communities condemn the state to
poverty.
Even in America, the practicality
of femininity will often suppress
the initiative of masculinity. For
example, many business ventures
are put aside, because the
practicality dictates the need of
steady income from a large
corporation that only wants skill
and not innovation.
As Saint Francis told Saint Clare,
you have to walk across the field
to find the path.
|
God invented families (not corporations
or governments) because "It is not good
for man to be alone". The family is made
of human material, so the only living
intelligence in the family has a
masculine-feminine cycle. Of course, the
masculine-feminine cycle can operated
outside the family, but as we have just
shown, the family still dictates whether
the intelligence takes the next step
into the greater community.
We can't have prosperity (goodness)
without following the fundamentals. The
strength of our intelligence is
determined by the difference between the
masculine and feminine. As we have
shown, every cycle's robustness is
determine by the difference between the
phases.
With our unisex attitudes, we somehow
think that we can separate our bodies
from our intelligence. In other words, a
common misunderstanding is that only our
bodies (not our intelligence) reproduce
sexually. As in many errors, the whole
concept of a unisex intelligence is not
even germane much less correct.
We have no functioning intelligence
without our bodies. Our bodies are
produced by both sexes, so our bodies
and intelligence are both sexes. They
have to be to have functioning
intelligence, because that intelligence
is determined by the masculine-feminine
cycle. As we have
shown, the initial
inspiration is received by our spirit
from another dimension, but the
inspiration will have to propagate with
the masculine-feminine cycle if it is to
ever become a conscious thought.
We are products of our family. The
strength of the family is determined by
how robust masculine-feminine cycle is
in that family. Does the family have
structure and stability (masculine
attributes)? Are the rights and thoughts
of each person in the family respected
(feminine attributes)? These things are
ingrained into us. We need both the
discipline of structure and empathy of
others to be successful in our ventures.
The masculine-feminine cycle is our
functional intelligence, and we grow up
in a family that hopefully provides
masculine and feminine models that we
can respect. The sexual models are not
absolutely necessary in every case, but
they make a profound difference. In the
Old Testament, we did not have those
models, and our understanding of God
suffered from it. In the New Testament,
those models were renewed with Jesus and
Mary, because God knew they were vital
to the Faith community.
If the perfect masculine model was
created without the perfect feminine
model, then the masculine model is
limited to the imperfection of the
feminine model. In other words, if Jesus
did not have Mary then our intelligence
would be limited to a strong feminine
personality such as Colette, Clare, or
Catherine as it was in the Old
Testament. Except, of course, the Old
Testament doesn't have a spirituality as
strong as these women, because the Old
Testament women did not have Jesus and
Mary.
Since the masculine and feminine
cycle propagates intelligence,
then the balance of that
intelligence plays a large part in
determining the intellect of the
community. In other words, if
either sex is more dominant, then
the intelligence will sink to the amount
of respect and clout given to the
suppressed sex.
In addition, the amount of difference
between the sexes determines the intelligence,
as we have
shown.
When God made the family so that Adam
would become good, all these things were
implemented into the design. Eve was the
feminine role model for Adam, and Adam
was the masculine role model for Eve.
Every human system develops intelligence
in the masculine and feminine cycle. If
not, then no intelligence is developed.
In other words, everything that is human
has to be individuated (defined -
masculine) and integrated (adopted -
feminine). It is obvious that if either
the definition or adoption is missing
than the intelligence dissipates and is
forgotten. A human system is an
individual, but it is also a
relationship as in Adam and Eve. So a
marriage has to have a masculine and
feminine cycle, or it will not develop
intelligence.
A marriage has to develop intelligence
to be good (flourish). In other words,
if a marriage does not use the
masculine-feminine cycle to increase
intelligence, the marriage failed.
Let's use the Holy Family as an example.
Since Joseph, Mary, and Jesus lived and
died as virgins, they did not produce
any children, but the intelligence is
divine. For example, Joseph awakes from
a dream, and takes Jesus and Mary to
foreign land in the middle of the night.
Yet, we do not hear Mary protest? Mary
must have believed that God would direct
Joseph, and she obviously believed in
Joseph.
How many people hear the word of God,
and think that it is crazy talk. Yet, in
the Holy Family, we see God directing
the family with no protest from any
member of the family. That is a sure
sign that everyone believed in God, and
they believed in each other.
While Joseph wasn't perfect, he was able
to take every step from the virgin
conception to losing Jesus in Jerusalem
without a single complaint being
recorded. The obedience and Faith of
Joseph can hardly be overstated.
The most defining attribute of the Holy
Family is their obedience. Joseph
defines the obedience by carrying out
wild and impossible directions from
dreams which he thinks are from God.
Joseph's obedience to these dreams is
more than bold and borders on insane.
Mary does not object of Joseph's dreams;
in fact, she nurtures the abandonment to
God's will as she integrates Joseph's
obedience into the Holy Family. Mary was
perfect and "full of grace". She knew
that all generations would call her
"blessed". Yet we never find Mary
questioning Joseph's capricious
behavior. Once when Jesus was preaching
a woman cried out, “Blessed is the womb
that bore You and the breasts at which
You nursed.” But Jesus said, “On the
contrary, blessed are those who hear the
word of God and observe it (Luke
11:27-28)." In other words, Jesus
declares the obedience of the Holy
Family as blessed and the defining
attribute of the Holy Family.
|
Self Control:
At this point, most of us probably
agree with Catholic moral teaching.
The main opposition, modern elitism,
seems rather pathetic even with only
the few points listed here and there
are many more. If high schools
presented both sides equally, we would
all be Catholic.
Alas, we probably feel that we are too
weak to live up to the Divine
expectation, but we don't need to rush
the agenda. That is not God's way. For
example, Jesus spent 3 years with the
Apostles, because He obviously was
interested in a relationship with us
which is the pivot point of our
strategy. As St. Therese said, Jesus
needs our love. That is the silver
bullet (the solution to all things)
which allows us to improve our lot.
When Jesus said that if we love Him we
will keep His commandments (John
14:15), but our guilty conscience and
defensive attitude usually makes our
interpretation to be backwards from
what the Master intended. In other
words, our ability to keep His
commandments is dependent upon our
love for Him. His love for us, gives
us the power to do the right thing.
Even the Apostles could not understand
how they would keep the commandments
of Jesus, and Jesus told them that it
is not possible for man, but all
things are possible for God (Mark
10:27).
As we look at what God has planned for
us, we probably think to ourselves
that we don't want to change, but that
is out appetites talking (not wisdom).
Even if we wanted to change, we
certainly don't know how to change.
This change is the spiritual journey.
We do not start at the end of the
journey which is the self control we
gain from our relationship with God;
we need to start by participating in
the Church and establishing a daily
prayer time.
For most of us, we feel that we
practice the love of God by helping
the poor. Every holy person would
agree with that, but God is looking
for a relationship (not just service).
How can we show love for God. The
answer is simple. We love God by
spending time practicing our belief
in God and our hope to know God. We
need to prioritize the time, so we are
consistent. When we pray, we need to
pay attention (focus). We spend the
rest of our time serving God. These
are
The Basics of Deep Prayer
which you can find on this website.
Deep prayer will help you to
develop a relationship with God, and
God will give you the control. Self
control comes when all parts of our
body have a relationship with Jesus
and Mary.
We are not hoping or guessing that we
will have control; the spiritual
masters (e.g., St. John of the Cross)
of the Church have this down to a
science.
You may feel that you are in a
hopeless situation. For example, you
might be divorced, remarried, and
excommunicated. These are difficult
issues, but remember, you have a
silver bullet. You only need to take
the time to get to know God, and God
will work through these issues for
you. Faith and Hope lead to Love, and
Love is all powerful.
|
|